If I hear one more evaluation that fails to give me a point for improvement, I am going to scream!!!
I may not like the point for improvement, I may not agree with it - but I still want to hear it. I come to Toastmasters to become a more effective speaker and that is never going to happen while people keep telling me I’m a strong speaker and they couldn’t find a recommendation for improvement. When it comes to new members I’m willing to let this go to a certain extent but after 6 months – 1 year in Toastmasters, shouldn’t the format of evaluations be clear?
C: Commend. Say what you liked / what was good / what worked in the speech and WHY it was good.
R: Recommend. Say what you didn’t like / what could be improved / what could be more effective in the speech and WHY this needs to be changed next time/why it didn’t work. Also, discuss HOW to improve this aspect – give the speaker a technique or tip to help them change.
C: Commend. Discuss another aspect of the speech you liked and WHY it was effective.
S: Summarise key points / reinforce statements in a positive manner. This should be a sentence long at most, just wrapping it up.
The whitewash doesn’t help anyone – not the speaker and not the evaluator. I refuse to believe that any speaker had PERFECT: eye contact / gestures / body language / use of voice / structure / pronunciation / facial expression / connections between ideas / use of pauses / audience engagement / use of language / etc. If they did, I want to see that speaker in action because in all my time in Toastmasters, I have never met a speaker who was perfect. Some of them are fantastic and outstanding and utterly brilliant – but every speaker can always improve.
As evaluators, it’s our job to help our fellow Toastmasters to become more effective speakers. Let’s do it properly.